|
UEL
Jul 15, 2009 21:34:10 GMT
Post by dtt on Jul 15, 2009 21:34:10 GMT
Hi Pete SORRY might be one that SHOULD be said to Belinda for forcing her to disclose personal information on a public forum . Why cant you people understand about friendship amongst the T10 ?? We were all opposed and had differing views at the start, we went to Tamworth met Gelled and have remained friends after. Not a clique just friends that banter on a perhaps personal level that is missed by those that were not there, and yes respect each other and are POLITE to each other ( you had a taste of that from Belinda) but you chose to dramatise it for public edification If you genuinely want this forum to thrive ( as I hope we all do) then lighten up and accept not everyone is against you this should be about debate not personalities and NEVER putting another member in the position you put her in IMHO Derek
|
|
|
UEL
Jul 15, 2009 22:07:32 GMT
Post by blinda on Jul 15, 2009 22:07:32 GMT
Thanks Del, but really we`re all settled and happy and friends again, so no one is need of any apology. Pete did not force me to disclose any information, I just wanted transparency of the PM that I sent him, so that posters could see I had no ulterior motive.
Who the hell is Gelled? Was she that HPC spy with camera eyes?
|
|
seekerofwisdom
Full Member
Seekerofwisdom (password seeker) is a general login. Please Identify youself by signature
Posts: 180
|
UEL
Jul 15, 2009 22:16:27 GMT
Post by seekerofwisdom on Jul 15, 2009 22:16:27 GMT
Del
Honourable though your intentions are, tamworth is sooooooo yesterday- this is a new forum and has a different agenda.
There is absolutely no need for reflection back to what was- this is a new start and well done robert- a fresh start that is proving to be fruitful already.
Sunseeker
|
|
|
UEL
Jul 16, 2009 7:51:54 GMT
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2009 7:51:54 GMT
I turn my back fo one minute I'm not thrilled at the direction in which this debate went. However I AM delighted that we seem to have reached an understanding. As per request I shall resist my urge to take a pair of editing scissors to what has gone before. I would pick up on what Del said here And suggest that EVERYBODY take this on board. There have been more than a few posts in which people seem to have come with fists already raised. I would also highlight sunseekers post in context of the above. Friendship is a fine thing and I value the friends I've made via this forum VERY highly, however this is a brave new world. Old friendships should not prejudice a debate any more than old animosities. So, I think we all understand one another a little better and I hope we can move on from here with a little more mutural understanding and perhaps even respect. Regards Robert
|
|
|
UEL
Jul 16, 2009 8:04:17 GMT
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2009 8:04:17 GMT
I would otherwise have put this in a PM, but in light of the recent discussion
Michelle Whilst I understand your opinion your post was not helpful or constructive. Please moderate your behaviour in future. Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, and I feel you made a good point regarding ensuring facts are established before stating them, but the personal attack on pete was neither justified nor helpful.
Pete I feel your graceful response to said attack did you considerable credit and made your point far better than a response in kind would have.
Bel. Likewise to pete I feel you have behaved with considerable integrity and grace in not responding defensively to posts which were worded somewhat aggressively.
There. All transparent and in the public domain.
Regards Admin
|
|
|
UEL
Jul 16, 2009 11:08:09 GMT
Post by dtt on Jul 16, 2009 11:08:09 GMT
;D
|
|